|
|
|
|
[Get Hebrew and Greek Fonts: the following web page will show the Hebrew and Greek in Microsoft's Internet Explorer 5.0+ only if you have the proper fonts on your computer. Get the fonts here.] Get copy of GP1 in PDF format From Part 1 of the God Papers by Walter R
Dolen "And Beginning at Moses and all the prophets, He expounded unto them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself" (Luke 24:27) GP 1: Introduction to the God PapersViews on God Views and Paradoxes on GodGods of Sciencegp1God, gods, and idols come in all sizes, shapes, and powers. All cultures have their gods. Even science has its god. In Robert Wright's Three Scientists and Their Gods (1988), Wright writes:
The god of science is the theory of evolution with its life-creating "black holes" and its invisible "anti-matter." Evolution does everything that the religious god does. Science thinks of itself as holy and worthy of praise, but it and its priests have created city-killing bombs, experimented on live humans, injected animal and human victims with drugs, diseases, plagues, and even theorized extermination of whole sets of people in the name of science. Gods of the Aztecsgp2In the past most were "religious." To appease their gods, mankind built great stone altars. On these altars, sometimes located on high hills or pyramids, they built fires. In these fires some sacrificed their children and virgins. According to eyewitnesses with Cortez, (1) in the Aztecs' barbaric culture, on top of the pyramid the high priest dressed in black would cut open a live human victim pull out the live, bloody and beating heart, extend his bloody hand to the heavens while squeezing out all the heart's blood. Then the victim was pushed down the pyramid, the heartless body would tumble over pointed and jagged rocks that ripped it all the time it fell to the ground where others would cut off the victims arms and legs, which were later eaten by the populace, and then the priests discarded the remaining flesh of the victim to the waiting half-starved animals, who were kept near the bottom of the pyramid, to eat the bloody remains that the populace would not or could not eat. Footnote 1. (Bernal Diaz, The True History of the Conquest of New Spain, Pub. 1568; Francisco Lopez de Gomara, Cortes: The Life of the Conqueror by His Secretary, Pub. 1552) Bizarre Gods of Yesterdaygp3In contrast some more "humane" societies only sacrificed animals: sheep, goats, and birds. Around their holy hills they sold animals for sacrifices. Temple prostitution was present in many cultures. Some walked on fire, wrapped poisonous snakes around their necks, and beat and disfigured themselves with whips and knives. Others prayed in various ritualistic ways to their gods with pious and disfigured faces, hoping that their gods would listen to them and grant their request. Kings assumed for themselves godhood and had their subjects worship them as gods. In their kingship they robbed and humiliated their subjects. These god-kings started wars, raped, killed, and destroyed cities and nations. Today's Godsgp4Today there are many theories on who or what is God. Depending on your education and mindset, some of these explanations of God are serious while others are ludicrous. There are few remnants of killing-sacrifices today, but there are financial sacrifices, verbal prayers, and ascetic rituals for the gods. Gods and Creationgp5Did a cosmic and non-intelligent soup create the universe, did a weak and pathetic god create it, or did an all-powerful God create it? The cosmic-soup theory (evolution) is omnipotent; it is like God: it creates matter; from it all life evolved; it's all-powerful. Although some theologians speak of God as all-powerful, for many God needs the magic of the cosmic-soup to create the universe and mankind. And for many God's power is tempered in someway because he is struggling for good against a surprisingly powerful Devil. For this "all-powerful" God, there is the "problem of evil." But there is evidence against the magical cosmic-soup, and against the weak-pathetic god. The intelligence and complexity of the cosmos cannot come from a non-intelligent soup or a weak-pathetic god. The genetic code of life that exists in each of our cells is one proof of the intelligence and complexity of life. This code of life must have come from a highly intelligent Power not from a non-intelligent cosmic soup. This, and much more, is evidence for a powerful and intelligent God. That is, a great intelligent Power has created the universe. Science, as understood by many, cannot and never will acknowledge a powerful God, because the very definition of Science rules out the supernatural: "science" was instituted to negate the overbearing influence of religion on knowledge, but if the true answer includes the acts of a powerful-creating God, "science" by its very definition will ignore this truth.
Who or What is the Creation Power?gp6 The real question is, who or what is this Power that created the universe? Is God the same as what we have been taught? What is the essence of this God? What is His behavior or personality? Is it even possible to know? gp7 An intelligent Power who created an intelligent and complex universe may have, should have, or must have somehow revealed his essence to mankind. We have come to the conclusion that the Power has revealed his essence. In the God Papers we examine God, the great Power, scripturally. This means, we will use the Bible to study God because we believe the Bible reveals the essence of God. We believe the Bible reveals the essence of God because of the Bible’s uniqueness, its history, its inner cohesiveness, its fulfilled prophecy, its continuing confirmation by archeology, and so on. Remember Science, in and of itself, will always rule out the supernatural; if the true answer includes the acts of a powerful God, "science" by its very definition will ignore this truth. You must read our paper entitled the "Bible Paper" [BP 3] or similar works by others to understand better the uniqueness and greatness of the Holy Bible. Just reading the so-called "higher criticism" of 19th century German scholarship, with its more than questionable presuppositions, and/or just reading the simplistic views of certain religious denominations will blind you to the message of the Bible. Please suspend judgment for now, and read on. gp8The question then becomes, who is the Lord (yhwh) or Jehovah (yhwh) of the Old Testament of the Bible? Who is Jesus Christ? Who is God the Father? Is the true God a Trinitarian God as some suppose? Is the true God a God of love? Is the real God a God of fire and damnation? Who or what is God? Paradoxes on Godgp9We will use the Bible to ascertain the essence of God. But the Bible seems to be highly contradictory. How can God be love (lJohn 4:8), and also a killer? In scripture the Lord says, "I kill and I make alive; I wound, and I heal" (Deut 32:39; 1Sam 2:6). Yet the Bible says that the God is good to all (Psa 145:9). How can God be good to all and also a killer? How can God predestinate some to wrath and destruction (Rom 9:21-23; Jude 1:4; Prov 16:4; 1 Peter 2:8), and some to mercy and glory (Rom 9:21-23; Eph 1:4-5; etc.)? Not only is God love, but He is all-powerful (Gen 17:1; Rev 1:8). In his all-powerfulness He even created evil: "I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things" (Isa 45:7). These are some of the Biblical paradoxes of God. Just how can God be love and also a killer, or how or why has He created evil? According to the Biblical definition of love (1Cor 13:4-8), killing or evil isn't one of the qualities of love. Yet, according to the Bible, God is love and in someway has killed and in someway has created evil. Most known attempts to negate these paradoxes of God have failed. Some call the problem of these paradoxes, the "problem of evil." But the only true description of the true God must explain these paradoxes. If one's explanation of God does not, then his god is not the God. Time to Study and Choose Carefullygp10The goal of the God Papers is to define God through His scripture. But this will not be easy. Christ even said: "no one knows who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and to whom the Son reveals" (Luke 10:22). Theologians have for almost 2,000 years been studying the essence of Jesus and the Father and have come up with differing views. The most popular views on God are based on Grecian views from a Greek culture and a Greek translation of the Old Testament Bible. It is from the Old Testament that most of our knowledge pertaining to God comes. Even the New Testament’s doctrine comes from the Old Testament. Therefore we base our study on the Hebrew Bible: the Hebrews wrote it (through God’s influence and power), and they wrote it down in the Hebrew language. If God wanted the Bible to come to us through the Grecian culture, he would have originally used the Greeks and their language to write it. But God chose the Hebrews with their language and its peculiarities. You will have to read and study carefully in order to ascertain. In the God Papers we will define and elucidate the Biblical God by logically incorporating apparent paradoxes into our definition of God. We will use the real Name of God to help us do this because the meaning of God’s Name is the secret to explaining the nature of God. Do read on. Two Basic LawsLaw of Contradiction and Law of Knowledgegp11There are two basic laws of reasoning and knowledge. These laws are so elementary that most people know them only intuitively. Only a few such as Aristotle and the stoic writer Chrysippus have attempted to put these laws into words. By amplifying these two laws we project the real reason why the all-powerful Power, the Real God, has "allowed" evil to exist in his creation, or in His own words why He, "created evil" (Isa 45:7).
We will explain the Law of Contradiction now; in GP 7 of the God Papers we will explain the Law of Knowledge and why the Power has allowed evil. God Does Not Liegp12Along with these two laws of reasoning and knowledge must go the important fact that the true God does not lie. God cannot go back on his word (Isa 46:11). In fact, it is impossible for God to lie (Heb 6:17-18; 1John 5:18; etc.). With these three things we will be able to understand who or what God was/is/will-be and understand why God has created the way He has created. If we do not believe in the two basic laws, we will not understand. (A point of fact here: if these laws do not exist, we do not and cannot understand anything.) If we do not believe ALL of God's words are truthful, it is futile to look for the truth, for how would we ascertain his true words from his false words? Law Of ContradictionWhat is the Law of Contradiction?gp13There is no greater principle in thinking than the Law of Contradiction. You cannot know anything, I repeat, you cannot know anything if the Law is not true. What is the Law?:
Aristotle is reported to have written this in his Metaphysics. Aristotle further said that "everyone in argument relies upon this ultimate law, on which all others rest." He said this principle or law of logic "must be known if one is to know anything at all." He also said, "if everything is and at the same time is not, all opinions must be true." If everything is and at the same time is not ...gp14Aristotle was right. There is no greater principle in thinking than the Law of Contradiction. Something cannot be all black and at the same time be all white. But a wall can be all white at noon time, and be all black at one hour past noon, because it was painted black shortly after noon time. Or for that matter, something cannot appear to be all white to a certain individual, and at the same time appear to the same certain individual as any other color. Either the object at that time was all white or it was not. But for those who ignore the Law, they say without blinking their eyes:
You protest. You say, no fool would say that a wall can be simultaneously black and white? Do read on. At the same time ...gp15A man cannot be legally married and not be legally married at the same time. But a man named Joseph can be married at noon time on Tuesday, and not be married at two minutes past noon time because his wife died at one minute past noon. But this Joseph was not: married and not married at the same time. Although you can say that on Tuesday Joseph was single, he was married, and he was widowered; Joseph was not single, married, or widowered at the same time even though on the same day he was all three. Good and Evil at the same time or ...gp16A man cannot be good (in the truest sense of the word) and yet at the same time commit murder. But John could have killed Joseph last year, yet today be good because he has changed from his former behavior. He is a reformed murderer. In the English language, you can still call this John a killer because in the past he killed Joseph, and you at the same time could call John, "good," because he has reformed. But you cannot say that John was good when he murdered Joseph. Time has an important part to play in the Law of Contradiction. Your general behavior cannot be good and evil at the same time, but your general behavior could have been bad in the past, and yet you have now changed your general behavior to that which may be called good. Same time in the same respectgp17Because of the Law of Contradiction, you cannot be physically present on First Street in San Jose, California at 1:30 PM on April 20 and at the same time be physically present on First Street in New York, New York. Of course those who play word games could say that at the same time you were mentally in San Jose, you were physically in New York. Notice the change in the sense of being in a place. For those who play word games, Aristotle qualified his statement: "the same attribute cannot at the same time belong and not belong to the same subject in the same respect." His qualification, "in the same respect," means that you cannot be, in the same sense, in San Jose and New York at the same time. "If everything is and at the same time is not, all opinions must be true"gp18» If the Law of Contradiction is not correct, you could say that John murdered Joseph at 1:30 PM, or just as truthfully say that the same John did not murder the same Joseph at 1:30 PM on the same day. Both of these contrary statements can be truthful at the same time, if the Law of Contradiction is not true. Again, if the Law of Contradiction is not valid, you could say and be 'correct': "I am alive physically, yet in the same sense and at the same time that I am alive -- I am also dead." But you protest again. No one you say in their right mind would say he is alive and dead at the same time in the same respect. Do read on. Word Games or Liesgp19The Law of Contradiction is so obviously valid that few say it isn't true, yet there are many who act as if the Law of Contradiction is not true by their belief in contrary theories. In fact, impossible contradictions are taught as truth each day in the fields of religion, politics, law, and "science." If contradictions are taught by "respected" people, they are accepted by some, even though at some level of thought they see the contradiction. Authority and tradition are strong -- so strong that real contradictions are taught as the absolute truth. Many dogmas use obviously false statements such as claiming: gp20How can Jesus be immortal and simultaneously experience death? There is a way to move beyond the paradox of Jesus being God, yet Jesus dying, without tossing out the Law of Contradiction. In order to know anything we must hold on to the Law of Contradiction. The theologians are making a mistake in their beliefs that force them to ignore and degrade the Law of Contradiction. Of course, by degrading the Law of Contradiction, they are making their biggest mistake, and this is why they will never find the truth. You cannot find the Truth without using the Law of Contradiction. Do words have meaning?gp21Please, please, please. Look again at the statement from the astronomer Hugh Ross, a person with a Ph.D in astronomy:
Ross is not stupid. But because Ross and others believe that Jesus is God, and that God is not mutable or changeable, (2) then in order for Jesus to die on the cross, he must have been dead and alive at the same time. Instead of examining their immutable theory they insist on saying that God was alive and dead at the same time.
gp22Do words have meaning? Apparently not for some theologians. Berkhof wrote:
I do not believe that Berkhof does not understand what death is. He merely doesn't want to believe it because of some view he holds. In order for some to believe in certain theories they must either change the normal meaning of words (death is not death) or diffuse its meaning. How can death be a different mode of existence as Berkhof maintains? He completely negates the meaning of death by asserting this. This is a ploy used by those who do not wish to look the truth in the eye. When their theory on the nature of God cannot hold up, they merely change the meaning of words, or make preposterous statements that claim and maintain: Knowledge cannot exist outside the Law of Contradictiongp23The Law of Contradiction is true. Once explained and understood it is the most obvious law. It is the basis on which we judge what is true and what is not true. It is the basis on which courts judge whether a person committed a crime or not. Either the murderer was at the crime scene at the same time as the crime or he was not. He could not, be there and not be there, at the same time in the same respect. Summarize the Law of Contradictiongp24The Law of Contradiction is the basis from which we reason:
But there are some, as Aristotle noted, that foolishly argue against this law. But I ask, how can anyone not believe in this law? If someone does not believe in this law, he cannot prove or disprove anything (at any one time something could be or could not be true); he cannot believe in anything (for what he believes in could just as well not be true). Trinity, Godhead and the Law of ContradictionImmortality and Deathgp25According to the Bible God is immortal (1Tim 1:17). Thus, it follows from the Law of Contradiction that God cannot be immortal (not capable of death) and yet at the same time be capable of death. Either God is immortal or he is not. He cannot be both mortal (capable of death) and immortal (not capable of death) at the same time. Furthermore, if at first, God was immortal, then at no time later can he die. If a so-called immortal person ever dies, it merely means, he was never immortal. If one denies this, he either denies the Law of Contradiction or denies the meaning of the word "immortal." To deny the meaning of "immortal" is to play a word game. "With God Nothing Shall Be Impossible"gp26Now some will think that yes God is immortal and yes those who are immortal cannot die, but "with God nothing shall be impossible" (Luke 1:37, KJV). Thus, they reason, in so many words, God (or Jesus Christ) before his "incarnation" was immortal, but nevertheless died on the cross, for without this death no man could be saved. They reason that this contradiction is not contrary because "with God nothing shall be impossible." But this kind of "reasoning" makes a mockery out of reasoning. It is against the Law of Contradiction and against scripture (They also use the argument that God is timeless, immortal, and immutable, and thus according to their theory, the fleshly body of the Son must have been "taken" because he could not literally be made flesh, for he was not mutable. See more against this argument in the Trinity v. BeComingOne Comparative Tables.) Incorrect Translationgp27There is a problem with the above argument. They use Luke 1:37 of the Kings James Version (KJV), but this is a mistranslation of the Greek text. Luke 1:37 from the Greek language says: "for not shall be impossible with the God any word." The Greek word rhema (Strong's #4487) was not translated in Luke 1:37 in the KJV. The Greek word rhema means: "word, saying, any thing spoken." Thus in the very next verse, Luke 1:38, we find this same Greek word rhema translated as "word": "be it according to thy word" (Luke 1:38). What was being said in Luke 1:37, is that God's word that Mary would have the child Jesus even though she "know not a man" (Luke 1:34), was not impossible (Luke 1:37). Thus Mary believing the words answered the angel, "be it unto me according to thy word [Gk. rhema]" (Luke 1:38). The scripture that says in the KJV "with God all things are possible" (Matt 19:26; Mark 10:27; Luke 18:27) is in context merely saying that even the rich men can be saved, for such things are possible with God. God of Law, Not of Confusiongp28To say that God can go against the basis of reason, the Law of Contradiction, is mockery. God is a God of Law (Isa 33:22; etc.), not of confusion (1Cor 14:33). God is a God of His Word: "So shall my word be that goes forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper whereto I sent it" (Isa 55:11). "I have spoken, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed, I will also do it" (Isa 46:11). God's Word Not Impossiblegp29Luke 1:37 is saying that all God's words are possible with God (see Greek text). Nothing God speaks or says is too hard for him for he created heaven and earth by his word (Psa 33:6). "Ah Lord GOD [yhwh] behold; you have made the heaven and the earth by your great power and stretched out arm, and there is not too difficult for you any word" (Jer 32:17). Notice in the KJV of Jer 32:17 there is again a mistranslation, "there is nothing too hard for thee," instead of "there is no word too hard for thee." It says in the Hebrew that no word (Heb. dabar) of God is too difficult for Him. Why? It is because God does not lie. Therefore any word he speaks is true. "The sum of your word is true," or "chief is your true word," or "truth is the head of your word," or "the head of your word is truth," or "your supreme word is true" (Psa 119:160, see Heb. and various translations). He who is the liar is Satan (John 8:44). Truth Isgp30The truth is: what is, at one point in time. What is false is: what is not, at a certain point in time. One statement cannot be true and false at the same time. God cannot be immortal and yet be capable of death. God cannot be alive forever, and yet die. God cannot go back on his word (Isa 46:11). It is impossible for God to lie (Heb 6:17-18; 1John 5:18; etc.). Considering everything, it is impossible for God to go against the Law of Contradiction. It Follows Thus:gp31From the above arguments it follows that:
Jesus Christ as a mortal man before his resurrection was a man, "the man Christ Jesus" (1Tim 2:5). He was a go-between (mediator) between God and man (1Tim 2:5). He was a physical son of God. But he did not exist (the one who died) before his birth (GP 4). Trinity Belief ImpossibleWhat is the Trinity Belief?gp32From the above, especially when you understand the Law of Contradiction, you know that three uniquely different persons cannot exist as one person at the same time (Trinity theory). The Trinitarians have been changing and redefining their theory on God from the beginning of their theory. But what many of them are saying is this:
gp33From, Logic and the Nature of God (1983), by Stephen T. Davis, the trinity doctrine is stated:
There are the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and each is God, and at the same time all are one God; and each of them is a full substance, and at the same time all are one substance. The Father is neither the Son nor the Holy Spirit; the Son is neither the Father nor the Holy Spirit; the Holy Spirit is neither the Father nor the Son. But the Father is the Father uniquely; the Son is the Son uniquely; and the Holy Spirit is the holy Spirit uniquely. All three have the same eternity, the same immutability, the same majesty, and the same power...." [p. 132] gp34Davis in his 1983 book further stated:
What Mystery?gp35"Not surprisingly, Christian theologians almost with one voice have stressed that this doctrine is a great mystery, perhaps the greatest mystery in Christian theology" (p. 132). But some of them use scripture out of context to prove this. They quote Paul speaking about mystery:
and misquote Paul:
gp36Paul wasn't acknowledging any mystery, this last verse is better understood from the NRS version:
gp37Paul was praying for others to understand the knowledge of God's mystery like Paul understood it. Paul did understand the mystery and in fact revealed it to the Church:
Therefore there is no mystery, for Paul was given the revelation to reveal it, and Paul did reveal it, as we will again, in more detail, reveal it in the God Papers. Trinitarian Belief against the Law of Contradictiongp38Thus, Trinitarians are saying that three uniquely different beings are a one, single, unique being at the very same time they are three. This is against the Law of Contradiction and against Biblical scripture as we will see. We can understand three in one, or even two in one, or even a million in one, but this "one," in its totality, cannot be exactly the same as each of the three, or either of the two, or each of the million. One in Number, but Three in Persongp39Either there is only one (single/individual) God or there are three (as one, as a unit, in some kind of unity or oneness) at the same time, but both "the only one" and "the three persons" cannot exist as the only one (single/individual) at the same time. When the Trinitarians are speaking of one God, they are not using one as a synonym for "unity." To them the oneness of God is not the same as the unity of God. When they speak of the "only one" they mean singleness, numerically speaking, of God. Yet to them there are three persons in this one (numerically speaking) God. This is the first real contradiction. A drop of water can only appear as either ice, or water, or vapor at any one time: all three states of the same water drop cannot exist at the same moment. Immortal Person Dies?gp40There is another real contradiction in their theory. In the Trinity theory they have an immortal being dying. Someone who is immortal cannot die. Someone with the potential to die is mortal. Anyone who says an immortal being can die either doesn't know the meaning of 'immortal' or is playing a word game. God's essence is not like the god of the Trinity as commonly taught today. God Not the Trinitygp41One reason God is not a trinity is because the Trinity idea is against the Law of Contradiction. For other reasons (documented in the God Papers) that God is not the Trinity, note the following:
In the God Papers the problem of God and his Son has been solved. Time plays an important role in the answer. But what about the Holy Spirit? Fourth Person in the Godhead?
(Of course, whether you know it or not, the theologians also deny that the three "persons" in the Trinity are in fact, persons. They use their own pseudo-word "hypostases" when they speak of the three persons in the Trinity, since they know that when we think of persons we think of distinct individuals, and three distinct individuals cannot be one in the sense the Trinitarians want to use "one." The Trinitarians wish to use "one" in a limiting sense that does not even coincide with the historical use and meaning of "one." See "One in History" below.) The Trinitarians tell us that because three "persons" (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) are called God in the Bible that this is proof that they are God and are the three persons in the ONE God. And that this is the Trinity. But ... Four or More Persons in the "Trinity"?gp43Wait a moment. With the Trinitarians own logic we can prove that there are four or more "persons" in their "one" God. According to the Trinitarians own special logic the "Holy One" could be the fourth person in their "one" God:
How about Five Persons?gp44We just identified a fourth person in the Godhead using the Trinitarians' own logic. How about a fifth person? The "Almighty" in the Bible did the same things the Holy Spirit did.
So as the "Holy One" could be one of the "persons" in the Godhead, so could be the "Almighty" according to the logic that the Trinitarians used to put the Holy Spirit into the Godhead. Metonymy and the Holy Spiritgp45The problem with the Trinitarian’s logic is that the Holy Spirit, the Holy One, and the Almighty are merely words that describe different aspects of God and are being used in the Bible in a metonymical way. The phrase "Holy Spirit" or "Holy One" or "Almighty" are metonyms or words used in metonymy. Metonymy is a figure of speech. "Metonymy is a figure by which one name or noun is used instead of another, to which it stands in a certain relation" (Figures of Speech Used in the Bible, by E. W. Bullinger, p. 538). Or metonymy is the use of the name of one object or concept for that of another to which it is related, or of which it is a part, as "scepter" for "sovereignty," or "the bottle" for "strong drink" (Random House Dict.). Another example is the "White House" is used as metonym when we say, "the White House said today...." What we mean is "the President said today...." The White House is not a person or power, but is a name of an object closely related to the President. When we say "the White House said today," we are using language in a metonymical way (a figure of speech) to say "the President said today." When we say the "Holy Spirit dwells in us," (2Tim 1:14) we are using language in a metonymical way to say "God abides in us," (1John 4:12) or "Jesus Christ is in you" (2Cor 13:5; Col 1:27). The "Holy Spirit" is another name for God. God revealed his name of names to Moses in Exodus 3:13-15. (see below) gp46The Bible uses hundreds of different figures of speech as Bullinger manifested in his book, Figures of Speech used in the Bible. One figure of speech the Bible used was the "Holy Spirit" for God, or the "Holy One" for God. The "Holy Spirit" is God's spirit. God possesses spirit because he is made up of spirit, for God is spirit (John 4:24). His spirit is the "Holy Spirit" because he is holy. The phrase "Holy Spirit" is a metonym for God, not a name of a different person of the Godhead, but a name of a different aspect of God. The phrase "Holy One" is a metonym for God because God is Holy. The "Holy One" is not a separate person of the Godhead, but it is just another name for an aspect of God. The word "Almighty" is not a different person of the Godhead, but it is just another name for some aspect of God for God is all mighty. In fact, concerning the "Almighty" the Bible actually says that it was just another name for the God:
Father is God; Jesus Christ is God; Holy Spirit is Godgp47God has many names as we show in Part one of the God Papers. The Bible used metonymy when referring to God. That is, the Bible used many different names and phrases for God. The Bible used the "Father" as a name for God. The Bible, starting with Christ's resurrection, used "Jesus Christ" as a name for God. The Bible used the "Holy Spirit" as a name for God. The Bible used the "Holy One" as a name for God. The Bible used the "Almighty" as a name for God. But God's most important Name is YHWH. This is why you baptize into the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is YHWH (Jehovah, or Yehowah, or Yahweh, or ... ). The Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit, the Holy One, and the Almighty are all just other names of YHWH. Puzzle of the Godheadgp48Remember that Jesus did not say in Luke 10:22 that no one knew who the Father and who the Holy Spirit were, except the Son. No, Jesus said no one knew who the Father was except the Son, or no one knew who the Son was except the Father. The puzzle of the Godhead had nothing to do with the Holy Spirit, but only the nature of the relationship of the Father and the Son. The "Holy Spirit" is just as much God as the Son, because both the Father and the Son (after the son went to the Father) are Spirit. But the Holy Spirit is not a different person of the Godhead, just as the Holy One or the Almighty are not different persons of the Godhead. The Holy Spirit is a metonym that manifests one aspect of God. It is just another name for God. The name speaks about one aspect of God: He is Holy spirit, or He is spirit that is Holy. God has many names and they all teach us something about God. But the main Name for God is YHWH (Yehowah) as revealed to Moses in the original language of Exodus 3:14 ff. An Example of Paradoxes and Timegp49In testimony at a trial, three witnesses testified that they saw drugs being sold from a certain house on a certain day. (All houses on the block looked the same, had no street numbers, but did have different colored garage doors.) Each witness described the house, but each witness described the color of the garage door at the house as being a different color. One said it was brown, one said it was red, and one said it was green. This contradiction almost led to the home owners (husband and wife) being freed, except for the last witness. The last witness, who lived across the street from the house in question, explained that the normal color of the garage door was brown, but at 11 am on the day in question the owner came out and sprayed it red. His wife came home from shopping that same day at 12 pm and the witness could hear the man and woman arguing. She apparently didn't like the color. So the husband at 1 pm that same day came out of the house and sprayed the garage door green. On the same day the color of the garage door was brown, red, and green, but never was the garage door all three colors at the same time. gp50What at first appeared to be a real contradiction, later just turned out to be explainable. Time played an important part in this story. At one time the garage door was brown. Later it became red. Still later it became green. The garage door was not brown, red, and green at the same time even though on the same day the door was all three colors. On this same day, in time, the door became different colors. Time played a significant role in this story, as does time play an important role in the understanding of the apparent paradoxes pertaining to God. Time and Change Play Major Parts in the Answergp51The immutability theory blinds all who examine the scripture so that they cannot see through the paradoxes and are thus forced to hold on to an obviously contradictory theory, and are forced to call it a mystery even though Paul's writings indicate that the mystery of Christ was solved (Rom 16:25; Eph 1:9; 3:3-4, 9; 5:32; 6:19; Col 1:26-27; Paul's letters did not give . gp52Knowing that time plays a major role, what we will see in the God Papers is this:
Attributes Of GodWe now must continue with our search for the real essence of God by studying the main attributes attributed to God. How is God described in the Bible? God Is Lifegp53»
God Has All Knowledgegp54»
God Is Everywheregp55But will God indeed dwell on the earth? Behold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain You. How much less this temple which I have built! [1Ki 8:27, NKJV]
There Is Nothing Else Besides Godgp56"That they may know from the rising of the sun to its setting that there is none besides Me. I am the Lord, and there is no other." [Isa 45:6, NKJV] gp57This scripture does not say there is not any like God, but it does say there is none besides God, "I am yhwh, and there is no other." Of course, if there is none besides God, then it follows there is also none like God. In a sense, the true God is everything; there is nothing beside Him. This may make little sense now, but after you read all the God Papers, you may come to understand. God Is Invisiblegp58As we have just seen, God's presence and/or spirit and/or power is everywhere. But up to the present, most, if not all, have not seen God in a physical way (Although some can "see" God in a Spiritual sense. See Parts 2 & 11). This is because God in this age is invisible to human eyes:
See GP 2 and the rest of the God Papers to further understand this. God Is Almightygp59»
All Things Possible for Godgp60»
This "all things (are) possible" is qualified by Matt 26:39, Luke 22:42, and Mark 14:35. It is qualified by, "if it were possible" and "not as I will, but as you will." Everything was possible before God sent forth his will, or his word. But once God wills something, God does not go back on his word (See below under "God Keeps His Word."). Also notice that in Mark 14:36 there is no verb ("are") in the Greek text; therefore, all things were possible (to take away the death of Jesus) to the true God before he gave his word or before God predestinated Jesus Christ's death as the true Lamb of God (Acts 4:27-28; 2:23: 3:18). Creator Makes All Thingsgp61God has all the power in the whole universe. In fact God is the creator of the whole universe.
gp62The scripture we just studied tells us that God is almighty. With His great power God created all. God made all things. But do you understand what all includes? "All" not only includes the good, but "all" also includes the wicked, their evil, and even the waster or spoiler and his destruction (Isa 54:16). It is impossible for the God to have created good without in some way also having created evil, for good and evil are comparative qualities which need each other in order for anyone to know either quality (See GP 7; NM20; NM9). All power not only includes all the power of good, but also, somehow or in someway, all the power of evil. Therefore God cannot be almighty without having power over evil. Yet at the same time God cannot be good and still execute evil. This is "the problem of evil" that the theologians write about. The power over evil is somehow included in God's power as scripture indicates, for God (YHWH) in someway or somehow even kills and wounds (Deu 32:39, see below), and even created evil (Isa 45:7). God's Connection with Good and Evilgp63Job said to his wife: "shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? In all this Job did not sin with his lips." (Job 2:10)
Paradoxical Sides of GodRight and Left Sidesgp64Notice that not only did the God create light, but he also created darkness (Isa 45::7; Gen 1:1-4). Notice that not only did God create peace, good, and life (Isa 45:7; Gen 1:31; 1Sam 2:6; Gen 1:24), but he also created evil and killed (Isa 45:7; Gen 1:1-2; Deut 32:39; 1Sam 2:6). There are two opposite aspects of God. You can call these two facets of God, God's right and left hand or sides. The Hebrew word for right hand (yamin) also means right side; the Hebrew word for left hand (semovl) also means left side. gp65Since Jesus Christ, who was sinless, went to "right hand of the power of God" (Luke 22:69; Mat 26:64; Mark 14:62; Psa 110:1; Acts 2:33-34) and since Christ is the only God (Jude 1:25; 1Tim 1:17; 1Cor 8:4), then the right hand or side of God is the only God. Since the left side as opposed to the right side is looked upon as belonging to those who are evil (Mat 25:33-34,41), then the power of the left side of God is the evil side, but at this time the left side is not connected to God. Again, we are not saying that this "left side of God's power" is now God or is now in God, for God is good, and Christ is now at the right side of God's power, and Christ is good, without sin. Remember that we are looking at the "problem of evil." The scriptures admitted and did not deny that the evil in this world was somehow the responsibility of God, for God created evil (Isa 45:7). The hard question is how God created evil; since God is good, how is it even possible for God to create evil, or be responsible for it in any way whatsoever? In this work we will find an answer to the problem of evil. Do read on. Right Side or Positive Aspects of GodGod Is Goodgp66First let us look at the positive aspects of God, which all admit belong to God, for we all know that God is good.
Not only is the one true God good, but God is or will be good to all:
When is God good to all:
God Is Lovegp67He who does not love does not know God, for God is love. [1John 4:8, NKJV] Love Isgp68Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; 5 does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil; 6 does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; 7 bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. 8 Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail ['become ineffective' -- because they will have been completed]; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away. [1 Co 13:4-8]
Love is Notgp69»
God Keeps His Word; He Does Not Liegp70It is impossible for God to lie (Heb 6:18, NIV; see, Titus 1:2):
gp71God does not lie, therefore all that comes out of his mouth, or all his words, are the truth. God's words are found in the Bible. Thus,
[This scripture does not mean that in our copies of the Hebrew text that there would not be any variant (even the smallest) when compared to the originals, but it means that it would be easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for the smallest word of God to fail. Note Figures of Speech Used in the Bible, by Bullinger, page 678, 1984 Baker printing.] If what God has said has yet to happen, it will happen. The scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35). Left Side or Negative Aspects of God:gp72An honest reading of the Bible manifests to us negative aspects of God. Here follows some of them:
gp73Outside of the question of natural disasters, some of the evil God somehow brings upon mankind is because of mankind's evil (Deut chap 28; Josh 24:20; "God's Wrath" PR4 to PR6; etc.), which in turn came from the influence of the "other-mind" (NM21). We are not saying here that the evil brought on each man is directly proportional to each man's sin (Luke 13:1-5). Anger of God or Wrath of God?gp74We just saw a list of negative facets of God, and in it we saw the "anger of God" ("his anger"), or the "wrath of God" ("his wrath"), or "jealousy of God" ("his jealousy") that destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah and others (Gen 19:24-29; Deut 29:23,20). What does the Bible mean when it speaks about the "anger of God" or the "wrath of God"? First look at 2Samuel 24:1,15-16:
gp75Notice that it was an angel of the Lord (YHWH) that did the destroying. By doing a computer search for the words "anger of the Lord" we see the following verses also speak of the anger or wrath of Lord destroying and killing (Ex 4:14; 32:11,22; Num 11:1,10,33; 12:9; 25:4; 32:13,14; Deut 6:15; 7:4; 9:19; 11:17; 29:20; 29:23,27; 31:29; Joshua 1; 23:16; Jud 2:14,20; 3:8; 10:7; 14:19; 2Sam 6:7; 24:1; 1Kings 16:7; 22:53; 2Kings 13:3; 24:20; 1Chron 13:10; 12:12; 25:15; 28:11; Psa 6:1; 21:9; 106:40; Isa 5:25; 30:27; 66:15; Jer 4:8; 7:20; 12:13; 23:20; 25:37; 30:24; 42:18; 51:45; 52:3; Lam 1:12; 2:1,6; Ezek 25:14; 38:18; Zeph 2:2-3; 3:8; Zech 10:3; etc.). Anger of God, Destroying Angel, and Satangp76From the Bible we know there are two kinds of angels: one good; one evil (GP3). What kind of angel of God, destroys? Who is the destroyer? There is a parallel verse to 2Samuel 24 found in 1 Chron 21:1,12:
gp77It is Satan that moved David to Number the Israelites against God's will. (cf. 2Sam 24:1-2 with 1Chron 21:1-2). By comparing both versions and other scripture in the Bible, we see that the "anger" of the Lord is an angel called Satan, who goes about destroying, "the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour" (1Pet 5:8). gp78Look at another verse that says the same thing:
In some way Satan is an "angel of the Lord" who destroys (1Chron 21:1,12). How can Satan be an "angel of the Lord"? Evil Angel's Fategp79It is this evil angel and his angels, who are on the left hand or side of God, that will be put in the fire at the end of the age for their evil deeds:
Right and Left Side Metaphorgp80By comparing various verses we see that the abyss is the great lake of fire, and it is this fire that will burn up the evil of the world (Mat 3:10-12; 13:40; NM24). As the above scriptures indicate this evil is so to speak on the "left hand" or "left side" of God. In other words, the Bible uses a metaphor that compares the right side or hand of God with goodness, and conversely compares the left side or hand of God with evil. It is the left hand that is cut off and sent to the fire. Notice the principle of the following pertinent verse:
gp81The all powerful God has the power of all good and all evil, or else he is not all powerful. What Mark 9:43 is telling us along with Matthew 25:41 and other verses, is that the God will cut off the power of his left hand or side at the end of the age and put it in the hell-fire for punishment of sins. God has Power over Satangp82Notice that the Lord does indeed have power over Satan:
So the Lord does have power over Satan, as He must, if He indeed is all powerful. The scriptures we are studying are hints, from which we will be able to understand and answer the "problem of evil." Two Sides of Godgp83As we are seeing there are two sides of God, or two facets of God that work together to create good and evil: one side creates good; one side evil. Both sides work together to create as the right and left side of our brain work together to form our knowledge, our speech, and our personality. Evil Never a part of the True Godgp84Does this mean that the real God now is in some way evil? No! God cannot be good and evil at the same time. Since the one true God is good, the real God can never be evil. Since God is all powerful, God in someway does have control over evil. But the real God now, is not doing evil. It is what we call the left side of God that is now doing evil. This evil "side" is not now the one true God. Evil will never be a part of God. But evil is being "allowed" in this age through predestination as we will see. As we will see in the God Papers, predestination, time, and God's real Name answer the paradoxes pertaining to God. Do read on. God Predestinates Wrath and Mercy before CreationHow can there be a good side and an evil side to God?gp85We have just seen that there are two sides to God's power: one good; one evil. How can God be good and at the same time be evil or responsible for evil? The answer is that the one true God is never evil, but good in the truest sense of good (Mark 10:19; Luke 18:19; Mat 19:17). Therefore the one true God was/is/never will be evil. Time plays an important part in answering this greatest of all paradoxes. God used his power to predestinate all things before this present cosmos (1Pet 1:19-20; Acts 2:23; 3:18; 4:27-28; Rom 9:21-23; Jude 1:4; Prov 16:4; 1Pet 2:8; NM19, under #1) and even before time (2Tim 1:9; Titus 1:2), thereafter all came out of God (1Corinthians 8:6; see Rom 11:36, see Greek text) to do God's pre-creation wish or purpose or will. By doing this, in this way, the one true God separated his power of good from his power over evil and thus the one true God himself (who is good) is not doing evil. It is something out of the one true God which is now doing evil through God's power of predestination. We call that "something" the left side of God because it was set up before the creation through God's power of predestination. Any planning before the creation of our cosmos and its law and order is not sin since sin is the breaking of law, whether known or not known by the law breaker. We cannot say God himself was doing evil through predestination because evil did not exist when he predestinated evil, and because God himself has not participated in any evil, since the one true God is good, all good, and can never Himself do any evil. It was the power of evil, that came out of God at the beginning of creation, that has been doing the evil in the creation. God created evil (Isa 45:7) by predestinating it (see below), and always remember this predestination occurred before creation. gp86As we will see in the God Papers it is through the following three things that the problem of evil and the paradoxes of God are answerable in a way that is not against the Law of Contradiction, and thus not against logic:
Scripture shows us that God somehow, through his great power predestinates evil and those of evil to wrath and destruction (see below). Contrariwise, God predestinates others for mercy and glory (see below).
Scripture shows God predestinating some to evil and wrath:gp87(Remembering that predestination occurred before creation [gp85]):
Some chosen to be good:gp88»
All generations chosen:gp89»
Predestination is very difficult to understandgp90»
No one resists God's will. As we said this is very difficult to understand. But after you have read all of the God Papers, it will be easier for you to understand. Not only will it be easier for you to understand, but you may see WHY God has made this creation the way he has. The Great Paradoxgp91God has ALL the power. This all-powerfulness must somehow include all the powers of evil. If God does not have in someway the power of both good and evil, then of course he does not have all the power. gp92But the true God does have all the power. Thus, he has in someway both the power of good and the power of evil. Yet somehow God is good and God is love, and God will give good to all. This is a great paradox. How can one be good and at the same time predestinate some to evil? How can God be good and yet at the same time kill and destroy? How can God be love and at the same time kill and destroy? It would be impossible for God to be love and at the same time kill and destroy. Or it would be impossible at the same time God is love to also predestinate some to destruction. It would be impossible because it would be against the most fundamental law of reasoning: the Law of Contradiction (see But it is within the Law of Contradiction for God to predestinate some for mercy and some for destruction, if they were predestinated before creation (as we know it), before time (as we know it), before good (as we know it), before evil (as we know it), before law (as we know it), and consequently before sin (as we know it). One thing that may confuse us is that we are in the creation and under its laws and if we plan anything that uses evil and destruction it would be wrong, but the pre-creation power was not under our creation's laws. Time Answers The Paradoxesgp93The key to these paradoxes and most, if not all, paradoxes concerning the true God has to do with predestination, time, and God's Name. There is a secret to God. When you know this secret the paradoxes concerning God are answerable in a logical way. The answer to these paradoxes has to do with the phenomenon of time, as well as when God planned and gave power for evil in his creation, and lastly the fact that one true God cannot be good and evil at the same time. All this plus the meaning of God's Name, which carries time within it (the was, is, will be one), is the answer to the paradox about God being love and God creating evil. The secret of "time" is hidden in God's Name. There is a time element in God's Name. This will not make sense now, until you understand the meaning and significance of God's Name. But before we learn about his Name of names, we should learn about some of his other names and titles. Name and Attributes of God Must Synchronizegp94We have just examined some of the main attributes belonging to God. We must synchronize all these attributes and scriptures: all must agree without inherent contradiction. That is, any of the many attributes of God must not be against the Law of Contradiction. There are thousands of scriptures about God and his power. There are about 2555 times that the word God (Hebrew, elohim) is used in the Old Testament. There are about 7000 times in the Old Testament that the word Lord or Jehovah (Hebrew, yhwh or Yehowah) is used. And there are over a thousand times in the New Testament that the word God (Greek, theos) is used. There are many other titles belonging to God that are used in the Bible. It is highly important that we understand what these titles are and the meaning of God's names. Titles or Names Of Godgp95Names or titles of God:
These could be called titles or names of God. These are not all of God's titles or names. But none of these are the real God's Name. God has one Name he has chosen to best represent himself. gp96There is something very important that we must know about God. By knowing the true Name of God we will be able to understand God much better, and we will better understand the paradoxes concerning God. The true Name of the God allows TIME to negate the paradoxes concerning God, and helps to answer the problem of evil. Importance of a NamePersonal Names had Meaninggp97Names of people in the Bible had more meaning to them than personal names have for us. To Israel personal names generally expressed some personal characteristic, some incident connected with birth, some hope, desire, or wish of the parents. The Biblical Hebrews had a tendency to play on names and find analogies or contrasts in them (see Ruth 1:20; 1Sam 25:3, 25; Rom. 9:6; etc.). For example the following play on the name "Dan."
gp98Personal names given at birth were sometimes changed later in life for various reasons. Sometimes the names given at birth expressed the time of birth, Hodesh (new moon). Sometimes the names indicated the place of birth, Zerubbabel (born in Babylon). Sometimes the condition of the mother called for a certain name for the child, Benoni (son of my pain). Sometimes the name of the child indicated the appearance of the child, Esau (hairy). Religious names were frequently given, the most simple being expressive of thanks to God for the gift of a child, Mahalaleel (praise to God). gp99Some names of people were changed by God to indicate what God was going to do with or through that person:
The word "Israel" comes from two words: Sarah ("prince" or ruler or commander) and el ("god"). Princes had their names changed on their accession to the throne (2Kings 23:34; 24:17; note information under "name" in Unger's Bible Dictionary, The International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, etc.). gp100In the New Testament names also were of a more distinctive nature than they are today. Names in the New Testament times, at least among the Biblical Jews, represented certain aspects of the person. For example, "Jesus" is the English translation of the Greek word "Iesous" which is the equivalent of the Hebrew "Joshua" (Jehoshua) meaning: "Jehovah (is) salvation." Thus, "she shall bring forth a Son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus, for he shall save his people from their sins" (Matt 1:21). gp101In the New Testament names were also changed during one's life time for various reasons. For example, Simon's name was changed to Peter and Saul's name was changed to Paul. Dual Meaning Of Namesgp102A name of a single person or quality can also refer to a whole nation or all those with that single quality:
A name of a person can also have a physical and Spiritual meaning: There is a physical Israel and a Spiritual Israel (see "Seed Paper" [PR 1]). Great Significance of the NameThe Name in Scripturegp103In the Bible there was a great significance placed on the Name of the true God. God revealed His Name to Moses when Moses asked Him for His name (Ex 3:13-16). His Name was a memento or memorial to all generations (Exo 3:15). Moses spoke in God's Name (Exo 5:23). God spoke to Moses and told him that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob knew God as "God Almighty" for God had not revealed His Name to them (Exo 6:2-3). God declared His Name to the people of the earth (land) by showing His great power against Egypt during the Hebrews' exodus from Egypt (Exo 9:13-16). God warned the Hebrews about taking His Name in vain (Exo 20:7). God said He would bless the Hebrews in every place in which He caused His Name to be remembered (Exo 20:24). God proclaimed His Name to Moses (Exo 33:19; 34:6). gp104Before the Hebrews went into the promised land God instructed them to seek the place where God shall choose to put His Name (Deut 12:1-5). The Levites were chosen by God to stand and to minister in the Name of God (Deut 18:l, 5). Aaron and his sons were to put God's Name on the Israelites (Num 6:27). God's Name is called on Israel (Deu 28:10; 2Chron 7:14; Isa 56:5; Dan 9:19). False prophets caused Israel to forget God's Name and use the name of Baal ("Lord") instead (Jer 23:27). Israel would profane the Name of God among the other nations (Ezek 36:21-22). Jews in Egypt would also forget God's Name (Jer 44:26). But the God delivers for his Name's sake (Psa 23:3; 25:11; 143:11; Isa 48:9). Since God's Name was called on Israel, if Israel was totally destroyed, God's Name would not have remained (Josh 7:9; Isa 48:9). Therefore, God for his holy Name's sake, promises to give Israel a new heart and a new spirit so they can keep God's law and thus not profane God's Name (Ezek 36:21-27). God told Moses that He was going to raise up a prophet to the Israelites from among their brothers, and that God would put His words in the month of the prophet (note, John 12:49), and that this prophet would speak in God's Name (Deut 18:15-19). gp105God told David through a messenger that David's seed would build a house for God's Name (2Sam 7:l-13). Solomon gave directions for the construction of the house for God's Name (l Kings 5:5-6). After Solomon finished building the house, God appeared to him and said to Solomon that His Name would be put there (l Kings 9:3). The temple was the house for God's Name (1Kings 8:15-20). God's Name was on Jerusalem and its temple (Jer 3:17; 2Kings 21:4, 7). The Name was on mount Zion (Isa 18:7). gp106Jesus Christ came in his Father's Name (John 5:43; John 10:25; Mat 21:9; etc.). Jesus Christ in a Spiritual sense was the true temple of God (note John 2:19, 21; compare with 1Cor 6:19; 3:16-17; etc.). Jesus Christ's Father is God (John 8:54; see GP 2 of the God Papers). God the Father gave His Name to Jesus (John 17:11-12, NIV, see Greek text; see Jer 23:5-6; 33:14-16). This is Jesus Christ's new Name (Rev 3:12). Jesus Christ's new Name is better than the angels (Heb 1:3-4). Jesus did his work in his Father's Name (John 10:25). Jesus said that whatsoever a follower of him should ask in his Name He would do it (remember Jesus was in his Father's Name) (John 15:16). gp107 » After Jesus died, and then rose up to life again, it was said that those believing that Jesus was the Christ (the Messiah) would have life in Jesus’ Name (John 20:31). After this, people were baptized into the Name of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38; 8:16) as directed by Christ (Mat 28:19). Those who were baptized into the Name of Jesus are in effect in the Name of Jesus and are said to be in the Name of Jesus (1 Cor. 5:4). Those in God’s Name are saved, have life, are justified, preach boldly, their sins are forgiven and they receive God’s Spirit, and signs and wonders are done by them (Acts 4:12; John 20:31; 1Cor 6:11; Acts 9:27, 29; Acts 2:38; 10:43; 1John 2:12; Acts 4:30). These are called in a Spiritual sense the "temple of God" (1Cor 6:19; 3:16-17; 2Cor 6:16).gp108The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit have the same Name (Matt 28:19). The 144,000 have the Name written on their foreheads (Rev 14:1). Remember those in the Name of Jesus Christ are in the Name of God because God gave His Name to Jesus Christ (John 17:11-12, NIV; Phil 2:9; see Jer 23:5-6; 33:14-16). gp109God is taking out of the nations a people for his Name (Acts 15:2, 12-14; Amos 9:11-12). In fact all nations shall be gathered to the Name (Jer 3:17; 4:2). God has sons and daughters from the ends of the earth who will be called by His Name, "whom I [Lord, yhwh] created for my glory, whom I formed and made" (Isa 43:6-7, 21, NIV). After God's judgment he will change the people's speech and call all of them by the Name of God: "For then will I turn to the people a pure language, to call them all by the name of the Lord [yhwh], to serve Him with one consent (Zeph 3:9, see Hebrew text; see YLT; see Eph 3:15). All people will be in His Name, and call or pray in His Name. If you can call in someone's name, you can be called by that name. gp110All through the Bible one can find where people call upon the Name of God and trust in His Name. By looking "name" up in Young's concordance or in Strong's concordance you can see how important God's Name was to His people. But what is God's Name? The Name of Godgp111As we've just seen there is great significance placed on God's Name in the Bible. The importance placed on God's Name has little to do with the pronunciation of the Name. Unlike today in many nations, the Hebrews placed more significance on the meaning of names. This is very important. We must not only take care to understand what is God's Name, more importantly we must understand the real meaning of God's Name. The paradoxes of God and the problem of evil can only be understood by knowing the true meaning and significance of God's Name. gp112For some persons what follows is too detailed and repetitive, for others it is not detailed enough. We will repeat some things many times in order to make our point as clear as possible because we must break through a prevalent mindset imposed by tradition. See "More Details" at the end of GP 1 for more specific information on some topics. What Is God's Name?gp113We must go back to the book of Exodus to find God magnifying and revealing His Name to Moses:
And God answered the question:
If you don't have Hebrew fonts on your computer the following is a picture
of "I will be" in Hebrew: gp114This is the literal English translation from the Hebrew text. But in the King James Version it reads: "I am that I am." The majority of English Bibles translates it this way. But this traditional translation is incorrect (See "I am" below ). I repeat, the "I am" translation is incorrect. Look at the following examples:
[But even though this is close to how Exodus 3:14 should be translated J. D. Hertz still allowed the traditional rendering of Exodus 3:14 to be used in the book's English translation of the verse.]
gp115The "that," or "who," or "what," in "I will be ... I will be" is a relative pronoun, 'asher (# 834), which can be translated in several ways such as: "that" or "who," or "what" or "when," etc (see Lexicon). Exodus 3:12 v. Exodus 3:14gp116To transliterate I will be that I will be from Exodus 3:14 into English without the vowels we get:
gp117The root form of the Hebrew verb translated into I will be in Exodus 3:14 is hyh, a to be verb (Strong's # 1961). With the addition of ' [a] to hyh [hyh] the word becomes, 'hyh [ hy<h.a,], and is now in the imperfect, first person, and singular form (Analytical Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon, note Table N; Gesenius' Grammar, §40a-c; The Essentials of Biblical Hebrew, by Yates, p.41). (4)
If you don't have Hebrew fonts on your computer the following is a picture
of "I will be" in Hebrew:
gp118This is the same verb as in Exodus 3:12: "I will be with you." Most English versions of the Bible translate Exodus 3:12 as, I will be, even the versions that translate Exodus 3:14 as, I am. This is important, so I'll repeat:
gp119Notice the Kings James Version of Exodus 3:12 as compared to Exodus 3:14:
gp120Do you see it? The same Hebrew word translated into I am in Exodus 3:14 is translated I will be in Exodus 3:12. Furthermore, this same word is translated into I will be dozens of other times in the Bible (See " But why is it traditionally translated I am? Yes, something very strange is going on here with this common mistranslation of I am, and that something has to do with the influence of Grecian philosophy on Biblical study, as well as the real reason -- the "other-mind." We'll examine more on Grecian philosophy later. God Revealed His Name To MosesGod Restates His Namegp121Right after God told Moses that his Name was I will be that I will be, and for Moses to tell Israel that I will be had sent him (Exo 3:14), God rephrased his Name and said unto Moses:
gp122After Moses asked God his Name, He answered with I will be repeating it twice, then He told Moses to tell Israel that his Name was I will be, and right after this He told Moses to tell Israel that his Name was Yehowah [hw"Ohy>: yhwh. God's Name is an imperfect verb used as a noun.gp123In Hebrew verbs were used as nouns. Without its vowels, Yehowah is spelled yhwh. Yehowah as with "I will be" of Exodus 3:14 is an imperfect to be verb in the masculine gender, except that it is in the 3rd person (see BDBG Hebrew and English Lexicon; Gesenius' Gram. § 40 & § 75s; see below). It is not a noun per se, but it is used in the Bible as a proper noun, and from context we can call it a noun (Gesenius' Gr |