[The following was taken from Part 1 of the God Papers by Walter R. Dolen]
Get the PDF file: gp1.pdf
What is God's Name
¶ gp87» As we've just seen there is great significance placed on God's Name in the Bible. The importance placed on God's Name has little to do with the pronunciation of the Name. Unlike today in many nations, the Hebrews placed more significance on the meaning of names. This is very important. We must not only take care to understand what is God's Name, more importantly we must understand the meaning of God's Name. The paradoxes of God and the problem of evil can only be understood by knowing the true meaning and significance of God's Name.
¶ gp88» For some persons what follows is too detailed and repetitive, for others it is not detailed enough. We will repeat some things many times in order to make our point as clear as possible. See "More Details" at the end of GP 1 for more specific information on some topics.
¶ gp89» We must go back to the book of Exodus to find God magnifying and revealing His Name to Moses:
And God answered the question:
¶ gp90» This is the literal translation from the Hebrew text. But in the King James Version it reads: "I am that I am." The majority of English Bibles translates it this way. But it is a wrong translation. I repeat, the "I am" translation is incorrect. In the note for Exodus 3:14 in the American Standard Version it correctly says the verse is: I will be that I will be. In a footnote for The NIV Study Bible, it has I will be what I will be.
¶ gp91» In most Hebrew lexicons it shows that this phrase in Exodus 3:14 should be translated, I will be that I will be, or I will be who I will be.
¶ gp92» In the Englishman's Hebrew-English Old Testament, by Joseph Magil (printed by Zondervan in 1974), Exodus 3:14 reads: I will be that I will be.
¶ gp93» According to The Pentateuch And Haftorahs: Hebrew Text, English Translation And Commentary, edited by Dr. J. H. Hertz, C. H. (former Chief Rabbi), published by Soncino Press, London (1956), in its commentary it states: "Most moderns follow Rashi in rendering [Hebrew - ehyeh asher ehyeh] 'I will be what I will be.'"
¶ gp94» According to The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1915 Edition) under "God, names of," page 1266, we see that it should be translated: I will be that I will be.
¶ gp95» By looking up the Hebrew words in The Analytical Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon, by Benjamin Davidson we see that the correct translation is: I will be that I will be.
¶ gp96» Even the Bible in Today's English Version, published by the American Bible Society in 1976, has in a note for Ex 3:14, I will be who I will be.
¶ gp97» And in the New International Version (1978) it has a note for Exodus 3:14, "I will be what I will be."
¶ gp98» And from the Brown, Driver, Briggs, Gesenius Hebrew and English Lexicon, "I shall be the one who will be."
¶ gp99» The "that," or "who," or "what," in "I will be ... I will be" is a relative pronoun, 'asher (# 834), which can be translated in several ways such as: "that" or "who," or "what" or "when," etc. (see Lexicon)
¶ gp100» To transliterate "I will be that I will be" from Exodus 3:14 into English without the vowels we get:
¶ gp101» The Hebrew 'hyh , in its common imperfect, first person, and singular form. (Analytical Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon, note Table N; Gesenius' Grammar, §40a-c; The Essentials of Biblical Hebrew, by Yates, p.41) The Hebrew hyh is a to be verb (Strong's # 1961). This is the same verb as in Exodus 3:12: "I will be with you." Most English versions of the Bible translate Exodus 3:12 as, I will be, even the versions that translate Exodus 3:14 as, I am who I am. This is important, so I'll repeat.
Notice from the Kings James Version:
Something strange is going on here, and that something has to do with the influence of Grecian philosophy on Biblical study, as well as the real reason -- the "other-mind." We'll examine more on Grecian philosophy later.
¶ gp103» In answering Moses, God used a Hebrew imperfect verb to state His Name. First God repeated it twice: I will be that I will be. Right after that God used the same verb another time: "And He [God] said, Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, 'I will be has sent me [Moses] to you [Israel].' " As we mentioned, this same Hebrew imperfect verb is used in Exodus 3:12: "I will be with you." It is the imperfect Hebrew verb ('hyh) in its common first person singular pronoun form.
¶ gp104» Then right after God said to Moses to tell Israel that "I will be" had sent him (Exo 3:14), God rephrased His words and said unto Moses:
After Moses asked God His Name, He answered with I will be repeating it twice, then He told Moses to tell Israel that His Name was I will be, and right after this He told Moses to tell Israel that His Name was Yehowah. "Yehowah" means: he will be or he (who) will be. (Brown, Driver, Briggs, Gesenius Hebrew and English Lexicon; Gesenius' Gram. §75s)
¶ gp105» Why did God make this change when giving His answer to the question? Let's look at it again. God repeated His Name twice for emphasis, "I will be that I will be." He then says again that His Name is I will be. He only changes it to He will be or Yehowah because this is the grammatically correct way for Moses or anyone else to address God. Moses could not say to Israel, "I will be has sent me to you." so Moses was told to say, "He will be (Yehowah) has sent me to you." By using "Yehowah" Moses correctly communicated God's Name to Israel. As Moses used "He will be" (Yehowah) to say God's true Name, so must we to be grammatically correct. We wouldn't call the true God, I will be, but we would say, He will be or Yehowah.
¶ gp106» When God spoke of His Name He used the first person I-Will-Be. But when we speak of His Name we use the third person He-Will-Be. The usual Hebrew word for He-Will-Be is yhyh . (Analytical Hebrew And Chaldee Lexicon, in Lex. and in § 24 rem. 3e; and see the Brown, Driver, Briggs, Gesenius' Hebrew And English Lexicon, under hyh and hwh) But God's Name is spelled "Yehowah" or yhwh. Moses apparently used a less common form of He-will-be to set God's Name apart, to make it holy.
¶ gp107» Without its vowels, Yehowah is spelled YHWH. Yehowah is a to be verb and is in the correct form for an imperfect verb in its third person, singular, masculine gender. (see BDBG Hebrew and English Lexicon; Gesenius' Gram. § 40 & § 75s; see below) It is not a noun per se, but it is used as a proper noun, and from context we can call it a noun. (Gesenius' Gram. §125a) One problem people have with God's Name is that they do not understand that in Hebrew verbs can be used as nouns, even proper nouns. (Gesenius' Grammar §§ 79, 82, 83, 116f, 125a)
¶ gp108» Yehowah is an imperfect verb in the third person singular pronoun form of the verb hwh. The Hebrew hwh () is Strong's # 1933 and means "to be, become, or come to pass." (Hebrew and English Lexicon, Brown, Driver, Briggs, & Gesenius, under ) It is felt by some to be a more ancient form of the verb hyh, and is found in Genesis 27:29. (Analytical Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon, Zondervan, p.172; and other Hebrew Lexicons) Yehowah is the correct form for an imperfect verb in its third person, singular, masculine of the verb, hwh, according to the table in Gesenius' Grammar, §40.
¶ gp109» Some call the Hebrew imperfect verb a future tense word, but this is not correct. From Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar (Oxford, 1980 reprint) we see that:
¶ gp110» More on the Hebrew Imperfect verb from S.R. Driver's Hebrew Tenses,
¶ gp111» It is clear here; there is no mystery. First God said His Name was I will be, then He changed its form so Moses would be grammatically correct, when Moses said "He will be (Yehowah) has sent me," instead of the incorrect, "I will be has sent me."
¶ gp112» Moses used a less common form of the verb to be. The common form was, hyh. If Moses used the to be verb "hyh," then God's Name would have been expressed as, 'hyh when spoken by God, or yhyh when spoken by us. For God's Name Moses used the less common form of the verb to be; Moses may have used hwh instead of hyh in his books in order to differentiate God's Name from the more common, hyh. The meaning of either yhyh or yhwh, is He Will Be.
¶ gp113» The Hebrew word translated "I Am" in many of today's translations in Exodus 3:14 is an incorrect translation because the Hebrew word is an imperfect or incomplete verb. The translation of "I am" doesn't give the full meaning of God's Name. The translation, "I am," doesn't take into consideration that it was translated from a Hebrew imperfect verb. The "I am" translation is not from the Hebrew text, but taken from a mistaken Greek translation of the word. Those who follow the "I am" tradition are mistakenly using the faulty Greek version as their basis.
¶ gp114» Instead of "I will be that I will be," the Greek (Septuagint) has "I am the Being" and "The Being has sent me to you" for Exodus 3:14.
It is important to point out the Greek version, the Septuagint, was made in Egypt and the Egyptian's god, Osiris, was addressed in their prayers as "the Being." (p. 151, The Gods of the Egyptians, by W.A. Wallis Budge)
¶ gp115» But the Old Testament was written in Hebrew, not Greek. Besides the mistranslation of Exodus 3:14, the Septuagint mistranslates the Hebrew word, YHWH; for YHWH it substitutes the Greek word for "Lord," which is Kurios (# 2962). From this early Greek translation we see many translations that use "Lord" instead of "Yehowah" or as commonly misspelled, "Jehovah" or "Yahweh."
¶ gp116» It was the "fathers" of the Catholic Church such as Augustine that were insistent on using translations from the Greek text instead of the Hebrew text:
¶ gp119» The Septuagint translation was done in Egypt, and it was in Egypt that the Jews were to forget God's Name: they began to use the Greek equivalent for "Lord" instead of the Hebrew YHWH or Yehowah ("Jehovah"). The International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia (1915 AD) speaks about the translation:
¶ gp121» If God's Being is what or like what others say it is, then God's very Name should have been written or spoken with a perfect verb. . . . [The rest of this section is included in GP1]
Click on the "back" button below to go back or click on "next" to see why God's Name was important to Him.
"Tolerance of evil breeds more evil"
All material on this Web site is Copyright © 1971 - 2016 by BeComingOne Church and or Walter R. Dolen
Press of the BeComingOne Church
This site is the press of the BeComingOne Church: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Those of the world said: "We gave you strict orders not to continue teaching in this name, and yet, you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and intend to bring this man's [Christ's] blood upon us."
But Peter and the apostles answered:
"All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility ... But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of opinion is, that it is robbing the human race ... If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth; if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error." (John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, Chapter 2)
Contact Us: E-Mail